Pratik Apparels, Ltd. v. Shintex Apparel Group, Inc.

88 A.D.3d 974, 931 N.Y.2d 531
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 25, 2011·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

[975] “It is the obligation of the appellant to assemble a proper record on appeal, which must contain all of the relevant papers that were before the Supreme Court” (Wen Zong Yu v Hua Fan, 65 AD3d 1335 [2009]; see CPLR 5526; Matter of Remy v Mitchell, 60 AD3d 860 [2009]; Cohen v Wallace & Minchenberg, 39 AD3d 689 [2007]). Here, the record assembled on appeal, which did not include a copy of the complaint, is inadequate to enable this Court to render an informed decision on the merits. Accordingly, the appeal must be dismissed (see Block 6222 Constr. Corp. v Sobhani, 84 AD3d 1292 [2011]; Emco Tech Constr. Corp. v Pilavas, 68 AD3d 918, 918-919 [2009]; Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v Vargas, 288 AD2d 309, 310 [2001]). Angiolillo, J.P., Leventhal, Austin and Roman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pratik Apparels, Ltd. v. Shintex Apparel Group, Inc., 88 A.D.3d 974, 931 N.Y.2d 531 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

88 A.D.3d 974 (Pratik Apparels, Ltd. v. Shintex Apparel Group, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pratik Apparels, Ltd. v. Shintex Apparel Group, Inc.
96 A.D.3d 922 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)