Yu v. Fydeski
Opinion
WO
Suzanne Yu, No. CV-22-02182-PHX-JAT
Plaintiff, ORDER
v.
Steven Fydeski, Desert Creek Film Fund I LLC, Desert Creek Film Fund Management LLC, Cloudburst Entertainment LLC, Cloudburst Distribution LLC, Storyboard Media LLC, and The Comeback Trail LLC,
Defendants. “Inquiring whether the court has jurisdiction is a federal judge’s first duty in every case.” Belleville Catering Co. v. Champaign Market Place, L.L.C., 350 F.3d 691, 693 (7th Cir. 2003). In this case, Plaintiff has alleged jurisdiction based on diversity of citizenship. See (Doc. 1 (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1332)). However, the complaint fails to sufficiently plead the citizenship of the parties. See Johnson v. Columbia Properties Anchorage, L.P., 437 F.3d 894, 899 (9th Cir. 2006). Specifically, a complaint must list the citizenship of every member of any party that is a limited partnership or limited liability company. NewGen, LLC v. Safe Cig, LLC, 840 F.3d 606, 611 (9th Cir. 2016). Accordingly, / / / / / / / / / 1 IT IS ORDERED that by January 23, 2023, Plaintiff must file a supplement to the complaint properly pleading the citizenship of every party or this case will be dismissed, without prejudice, for lack of federal subject matter jurisdiction. Dated this 10th day of January, 2023. '
g James A. C rg Senior United States District Judge
_2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Yu v. Fydeski (Yu v. Fydeski) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.