Yu v. Fydeski

District Court, D. Arizona·Decided January 20, 2023·No. 2:22-cv-02182·Unknown

Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

9 Suzanne Yu, No. CV-22-02182-PHX-JAT

10 Plaintiff, ORDER

11 v.

12 Steven Fydeski, Desert Creek Film Fund I LLC, Desert Creek Film Fund Management 13 LLC, Cloudburst Entertainment LLC, Cloudburst Distribution LLC, Storyboard 14 Media LLC, and The Comeback Trail LLC,

15 Defendants. 16 17 On January 10, 2023, the Court issued the following order: 18 “Inquiring whether the court has jurisdiction is a federal judge’s first duty in every case.” Belleville Catering Co. v. Champaign Market Place, 19 L.L.C., 350 F.3d 691, 693 (7th Cir. 2003). In this case, Plaintiff has alleged jurisdiction based on diversity of citizenship. See (Doc. 1 (citing 28 U.S.C. § 20 1332)). However, the complaint fails to sufficiently plead the citizenship of the parties. See Johnson v. Columbia Properties Anchorage, L.P., 437 F.3d 21 894, 899 (9th Cir. 2006). Specifically, a complaint must list the citizenship of every member of any party that is a limited partnership or limited liability 22 company. NewGen, LLC v. Safe Cig, LLC, 840 F.3d 606, 611 (9th Cir. 2016). Accordingly, 23 IT IS ORDERED that by January 23, 2023, Plaintiff must file a supplement to the complaint properly pleading the citizenship of every party 24 or this case will be dismissed, without prejudice, for lack of federal subject matter jurisdiction. 25 (Doc. 6). 26 On January 11, 2023, Plaintiff filed a supplement which alleged the citizenship of 27 some, but not all, relevant limited liability companies. The Court will give Plaintiff one 28 last opportunity to plead jurisdiction before the Court dismisses this case without prejudice || for lack of federal subject matter jurisdiction. Therefore, 2 IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff has until January 27, 2023, to file a second 3 || supplement to the complaint fully alleging the citizenship of all parties. 4 Dated this 20th day of January, 2023. 5 6 '

James A, CO 8 Senior United States District Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

_2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Yu v. Fydeski, (D. Ariz. 2023).

Yu v. Fydeski (Yu v. Fydeski) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Newgen, LLC v. Safe Cig, LLC
840 F.3d 606 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)
Skoros v. City of New York
437 F.3d 1 (Second Circuit, 2006)