Young v. Young

Ohio Supreme Court

Young v. Young

1994 Ohio 97, 70 Ohio St. 3d 679

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 8, 1994

Docket1994-1220

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 1994 Ohio 97 (Young v. Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Young v. Young, 1994 Ohio 97, 70 Ohio St. 3d 679 (Ohio 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 70 Ohio St.3d 679.]

YOUNG, APPELLANT, v. YOUNG, APPELLEE. [Cite as Young v. Young, 1994-Ohio-97.] Domestic relations—Child support—Order to pay child support may be enforced by means of imprisonment through contempt proceedings even after the child who is the subject of the order is emancipated. (No. 94-1220—Submitted September 13, 1994—Decided November 9, 1994.) Appeal from the Court of Appeals for Miami County, No. 93-CA-10. __________________ Gretchen K. Beers and Ann Ratcliff, Miami County Child Support Enforcement Agency, for appellant. Louie R. Kindell & Associates and Louie R. Kindell, for appellee. __________________ {¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is allowed; the judgment of the court of appeals is reversed and the judgment of the court of common pleas is reinstated on the authority of Cramer v. Petrie (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 131, 637 N.E.2d 882. MOYER, C.J., A.W. SWEENEY, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 70 Ohio St.3d 679.]

YOUNG, APPELLANT, v. YOUNG, APPELLEE. [Cite as Young v. Young, 1994-Ohio-97.] Domestic relations—Child support—Order to pay child support may be enforced by means of imprisonment through contempt proceedings even after the child who is the subject of the order is emancipated. (No. 94-1220—Submitted September 13, 1994—Decided November 9, 1994.) Appeal from the Court of Appeals for Miami County, No. 93-CA-10. __________________ Gretchen K. Beers and Ann Ratcliff, Miami County Child Support Enforcement Agency, for appellant. Louie R. Kindell & Associates and Louie R. Kindell, for appellee. __________________ {¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is allowed; the judgment of the court of appeals is reversed and the judgment of the court of common pleas is reinstated on the authority of Cramer v. Petrie (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 131, 637 N.E.2d 882. MOYER, C.J., A.W. SWEENEY, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur. __________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1994 Ohio 97, 70 Ohio St. 3d 679, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-young-ohio-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack