Young v. State

636 So. 2d 205, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4837, 1994 WL 189613
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Young v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 585 So. 2d 1184
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 18, 1994·No. No. 93-1471·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Decile v. State, 516 So.2d 1139 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987); Tompkins v. State, 502 So.2d 415, 419 (Fla.1986), cert. denied, 483 U.S. 1033, 107 S.Ct. 3277, 97 L.Ed.2d 781 (1987).

GLICKSTEIN, WARNER and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Young v. State, 636 So. 2d 205, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4837, 1994 WL 189613 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

636 So. 2d 205 (Young v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tompkins v. State
502 So. 2d 415 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1986)
Decile v. State
516 So. 2d 1139 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Tafero v. Dugger
483 U.S. 1033 (Supreme Court, 1987)