Young v. State
588 So. 2d 690, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 11399, 1991 WL 239914
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Young v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 566 So. 2d 69 →
Opinion
We affirm the habitual felony offender sentence imposed upon appellant in this case, but remand the sentencing and probation documents with directions to conform the written probation order with the trial court’s oral pronouncement at sentencing, i.e., to reflect a fifteen-year habitual felony offender sentence, with eight years of the sentence suspended, to be followed by five years probation. See Timmons v. State, 453 So.2d 143 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).
Accordingly, this matter is remanded for correction of the written probation order.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Young v. State, 588 So. 2d 690, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 11399, 1991 WL 239914 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).
588 So. 2d 690 (Young v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Timmons v. State
453 So. 2d 143 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)