Young v. State

539 So. 2d 1197, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 788, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1564, 1989 WL 27944
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Young v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 519 So. 2d 719
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 29, 1989·No. No. 88-1735·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the conviction and sentence in all respects except the assessment of costs, which we strike, without prejudice to the state’s right to apply for assessment of same after proper notice and hearing.

ANSTEAD, GLICKSTEIN and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Young v. State, 539 So. 2d 1197, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 788, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1564, 1989 WL 27944 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

539 So. 2d 1197 (Young v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.