Young v. State

519 So. 2d 704, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 353, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 446, 1988 WL 7063
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Young v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 519 So. 2d 719
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 3, 1988·No. No. 86-3043·Published

Opinion

THREADGILL, Judge.

Appellant, Frances Young, appeals her five-year sentence for second degree grand theft, claiming that the trial court’s reasons for upward departure from the guidelines are invalid and not supported by the record. The reasons given for departure were based on (1) the defendant’s prior criminal history, (2) the facts of the case, and (3) a perceived disregard for the criminal justice system. A prior criminal record has repeatedly been found an invalid reason for departure. We have considered the other reasons as they relate to this record and find that neither will support departure. We therefore reverse Young’s sentence and remand for resentencing within the guidelines recommended range.

Reversed and remanded.

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and LEHAN, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Young v. State, 519 So. 2d 704, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 353, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 446, 1988 WL 7063 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

519 So. 2d 704 (Young v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.