Young v. State
598 So. 2d 1084, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6614, 1992 WL 123498
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 10, 1992·No. No. 92-1388·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
We reverse the trial court’s order, summarily denying post-conviction relief, and remand because the trial court did not attach to the order those portions of the record upon which it relied, even though it referred to them as attached. Taylor v. State, 583 So.2d 823 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); Gentry v. State, 464 So.2d 659 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Young v. State, 598 So. 2d 1084, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6614, 1992 WL 123498 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).
598 So. 2d 1084 (Young v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Brinson v. State
625 So. 2d 132 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Lewis v. State
613 So. 2d 115 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)