Young v. State

629 So. 2d 1116, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 192, 1994 WL 12419
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Young v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 585 So. 2d 1184
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 21, 1994·No. No. 93-2386·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Johnny C. Young, Sr., appeals the summary denial of his motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Because Young’s motion is not included in the record on appeal and cannot be located by the clerk below, the state concedes that the motion has been inadvertently misplaced not due to the fault of Young. We vacate the trial court’s order and remand this cause to the trial court with directions to Young to refile his motion within 60 days of issuance of the mandate in this case, which motion should be deemed timely if so filed, and for further proceedings thereon. See, e.g., Bell v. State, 595 So.2d 1018 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992).

Order VACATED; cause REMANDED.

DAUKSCH, PETERSON and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Young v. State, 629 So. 2d 1116, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 192, 1994 WL 12419 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

629 So. 2d 1116 (Young v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bell v. State
595 So. 2d 1018 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)