Young v. State
616 So. 2d 1230, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 5004, 1993 WL 140094
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Young v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 566 So. 2d 69 →
Opinion
We remand this case to the trial court for the correction of two errors, both of which are conceded by the state. It was error to sua sponte assess a public defender fee against appellant where no motion had been filed by the public defender. See In the interest of R.B., 582 So.2d 163, 164 (Fla. 4th DCA1991). It was also error to order appellant to pay $50.00 in court costs where the statute establishes the amount as $20.00. See § 960.20, Fla.Stat. (1991).
[1231]*1231AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Young v. State, 616 So. 2d 1230, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 5004, 1993 WL 140094 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).
616 So. 2d 1230 (Young v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Interest of RB
582 So. 2d 163 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)