York v. Fischer

55 A.D.3d 1096, 864 N.Y.S.2d 923, 56 A.D.2d 919, 868 N.Y.S.2d 326
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 23, 2008
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 55 A.D.3d 1096 (York v. Fischer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
York v. Fischer, 55 A.D.3d 1096, 864 N.Y.S.2d 923, 56 A.D.2d 919, 868 N.Y.S.2d 326 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner, a prison inmate, commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a tier III disciplinary determination finding him guilty of violating facility correspondence regulations. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at hand has been administratively reversed and all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record. Therefore, inasmuch as petitioner has received all of the relief to which he is entitled, this matter is dismissed as moot (see Matter of Eleby v Fischer, 52 AD3d 1138, 1139 [2008]).

Cardona, EJ., Spain, Carpinello, Kane and Malone Jr., JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lozada v. Fischer
65 A.D.3d 1433 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Smart v. Fischer
65 A.D.3d 1436 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
McCaskell v. Fischer
65 A.D.3d 771 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Hinds v. Venettozzi
64 A.D.3d 1095 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Shabazz v. Artus
62 A.D.3d 1230 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Williams v. Fischer
62 A.D.3d 1133 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Mathie v. Yelich
62 A.D.3d 1064 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Delgado v. New York State Department of Corrections
62 A.D.3d 1069 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Hart v. Fischer
60 A.D.3d 1226 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Hardy v. Bezio
60 A.D.3d 1229 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Barclay v. Summers
60 A.D.3d 1181 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Munnerlyn v. Lilley
59 A.D.3d 836 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
55 A.D.3d 1096, 864 N.Y.S.2d 923, 56 A.D.2d 919, 868 N.Y.S.2d 326, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/york-v-fischer-nyappdiv-2008.