Williams v. Fischer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Williams v. Fischer

60 A.D.3d 1229, 874 N.Y.S.2d 395

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 19, 2009

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 60 A.D.3d 1229 (Williams v. Fischer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Williams v. Fischer, 60 A.D.3d 1229, 874 N.Y.S.2d 395 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Clinton County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner, a prison inmate, commenced this proceeding challenging a tier II disciplinary determination finding him guilty of disobeying a direct order and being out of place. The Attorney General has advised this Court, by a memorandum from the Department of Correctional Services, that the administrative determination has been reversed and all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record. Accordingly, petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled and this matter is dismissed as moot (see Matter of Decker v Selsky, 53 AD3d 996 [2008]; Matter of Correnti v Leclaire, 52 AD3d 1153 [2008]).

Lahtinen, J.P., Malone Jr., Kavanagh, Stein and McCarthy, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Clinton County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner, a prison inmate, commenced this proceeding challenging a tier II disciplinary determination finding him guilty of disobeying a direct order and being out of place. The Attorney General has advised this Court, by a memorandum from the Department of Correctional Services, that the administrative determination has been reversed and all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record. Accordingly, petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled and this matter is dismissed as moot (see Matter of Decker v Selsky, 53 AD3d 996 [2008]; Matter of Correnti v Leclaire, 52 AD3d 1153 [2008]).

Lahtinen, J.P., Malone Jr., Kavanagh, Stein and McCarthy, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 A.D.3d 1229, 874 N.Y.S.2d 395, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-fischer-nyappdiv-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack