Hardy v. Bezio

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hardy v. Bezio

60 A.D.3d 1229, 874 N.Y.S.2d 395

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 19, 2009

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 60 A.D.3d 1229 (Hardy v. Bezio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hardy v. Bezio, 60 A.D.3d 1229, 874 N.Y.S.2d 395 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Chemung County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

At the conclusion of a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of violating various prison disciplinary rules. After that determination was administratively affirmed, petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking annulment. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination in issue has been administratively reversed and all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record. Accordingly, inasmuch as petitioner has been afforded all of the relief to which he is entitled, this matter is dismissed as moot (see Matter of York v Fischer, 55 AD3d 1096 [2008]).

[1230]*1230Rose, J.P., Malone Jr., Kavanagh, Stein and McCarthy, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Chemung County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

At the conclusion of a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of violating various prison disciplinary rules. After that determination was administratively affirmed, petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking annulment. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination in issue has been administratively reversed and all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record. Accordingly, inasmuch as petitioner has been afforded all of the relief to which he is entitled, this matter is dismissed as moot (see Matter of York v Fischer, 55 AD3d 1096 [2008]).

[1230]*1230Rose, J.P., Malone Jr., Kavanagh, Stein and McCarthy, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 A.D.3d 1229, 874 N.Y.S.2d 395, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hardy-v-bezio-nyappdiv-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack