Yeoman v. Brown
This text of 10 Vet. App. 383 (Yeoman v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
ORDER
On January 8, 1997, in a memorandum decision, the Court affirmed the Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision on appeal. On January 13, 1997, the appellant, through counsel, filed a motion for reconsideration or, in the alternative, for panel review. The motion also requested review by the full Court, if reconsideration and review by a panel are denied.
Upon consideration of the foregoing and the record on appeal, it is
ORDERED that the appellant’s motion for reconsideration is denied. It is further
ORDERED that the appellant’s motion for review by a panel is denied. It is further
ORDERED that the appellant’s motion for review by the full Court is deemed prematare and is not accepted for filing. See Rule 35(d) of this Court’s Rules of Practice and Procedure.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
10 Vet. App. 383, 1997 WL 762034, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yeoman-v-brown-cavc-1997.