Yates v. Aiken
474 U.S. 896, 106 S. Ct. 218, 88 L. Ed. 2d 218, 1985 U.S. LEXIS 3894
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 15, 1985·No. No. 85-5193·Published·Cited by 17 cases
Opinion
Sup. Ct. S. C. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed informa pauperis and certiorari granted. Judgment vacated and case remanded for further consideration in light of Francis v. Franklin, 471 U. S. 307 (1985).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Yates v. Aiken, 474 U.S. 896, 106 S. Ct. 218, 88 L. Ed. 2d 218, 1985 U.S. LEXIS 3894 (1985).
474 U.S. 896 (Yates v. Aiken) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wilson v. Moore
178 F.3d 266 (Fourth Circuit, 1999)
No. 98-6577
178 F.3d 266 (Fourth Circuit, 1999)
Tucker v. Moore
56 F. Supp. 2d 611 (D. South Carolina, 1999)
McFarland v. Scott
512 U.S. 1256 (Supreme Court, 1994)
Yates v. Evatt
500 U.S. 391 (Supreme Court, 1991)
Sanchez v. State
755 P.2d 245 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1988)
Yates v. Aiken
484 U.S. 211 (Supreme Court, 1988)
Yates v. Aiken
349 S.E.2d 84 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1986)
William Gibbs Hyman v. James Aiken, Warden, Cci, and Travis Medlock, Attorney General, State of South Carolina
777 F.2d 938 (Fourth Circuit, 1985)