Xayphone Phanhouvong v. Kristi Noem, et. al.

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. California
DecidedMarch 25, 2026
Docket1:26-cv-02147
StatusUnknown

This text of Xayphone Phanhouvong v. Kristi Noem, et. al. (Xayphone Phanhouvong v. Kristi Noem, et. al.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Xayphone Phanhouvong v. Kristi Noem, et. al., (E.D. Cal. 2026).

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 XAYPHONE PHANHOUVONG, No. 1:26-cv-02147-DC-DMC-HC 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER 14 KRISTI NOEM, et. al., 15 Respondents. 16 17 Petitioner, an immigration detainee proceeding pro se, filed a petition for a writ of 18 habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The court has conducted a preliminary review of the 19 petition pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Habeas Corpus Cases Under Section 2254.1 20 Because Petitioner may be entitled to the requested relief if the claimed violation of constitutional 21 rights is proved, Respondent will be directed to show cause why the writ should not be granted by 22 filing an answer/return within 14 days from the date of this order. See 28 U.S.C. § 2243. 23 Petitioner may file a reply/traverse to the answer/return within 7 days after being served a copy of 24 it. Petitioner is additionally directed to file a notice with the Court or inform Respondents, at the 25 email of record ihsan.ahmed@usdoj.gov, of his A-Number within three days of the date of this 26

27 1 Rule 1(b) of the Rules Governing Habeas Corpus Cases Under Section 2254 allows a district court to apply any or all of the rules to other types of habeas corpus petitions including § 2241 28 petitions. 1 || order. In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. Respondent 1s directed to file an answer/return within 14 days from the date of 3 this order. If an answer/return is filed, Respondent shall include with the answer/return 4 any and all transcripts or other documents relevant to the determination of the issues 5 presented in the application. 6 2. Petitioner’s reply/traverse, if any, is due within 7 days after being served a copy 7 of Respondent’s answer/return. 8 3. Petitioner is directed to file a notice of his A-Number, or inform Respondents at 9 their email on record, ihsan.ahmed@usdoj.gov, of his A-Number within 3 days of the date 10 of this order. 11 4. In order to ensure this court’s jurisdiction to resolve the pending § 2241 12 petition, Respondent shall not transfer petitioner to another detention center outside of this 13 judicial district, pending further order of the court. See 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a) (establishing 14 the All Writs Act which empowers the federal courts to “issue all writs necessary or 15 appropriate in aid of their respective jurisdictions....”); see also F.T.C. v. Dean Foods Co., 16 384 U.S. 597, 604 (1966) (emphasizing that federal courts have the power to “to preserve 17 the court’s jurisdiction or maintain the status quo by injunction pending review of an 18 agency’s action”). 19 20 | Dated: March 24, 2026 Co DENNIS M. COTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 23 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Federal Trade Commission v. Dean Foods Co.
384 U.S. 597 (Supreme Court, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Xayphone Phanhouvong v. Kristi Noem, et. al., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/xayphone-phanhouvong-v-kristi-noem-et-al-caed-2026.