Wright v. State

70 S.E. 968, 9 Ga. App. 235, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 490
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 11, 1911·No. 3270·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Hill, C. J.

1. The amendment to the motion for a new trial was “allowed,” but the ground thereof was not approved or verified in any manner by the trial judge, and' will not be considered by this court. Wilson v. Cobb, 4 Ga. App. 272 (61 S. E. 133) ; Thomas v. State, 7 Ga. App. 337 (66 S. E. 964); Henderson v. State, 7 Ga. App. 810 (68 S. E. 333); Thornton v. Cordell, 8 Ga. App. 588 (70 S. E. 17).

2. The original motion for a new trial contained only the usual general grounds, and the verdict is fully supported by the evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wright v. State, 70 S.E. 968, 9 Ga. App. 235, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 490 (Ga. Ct. App. 1911).

70 S.E. 968 (Wright v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Braddy v. State
148 S.E. 600 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)
Trammell v. Shirley
145 S.E. 486 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)