Wright v. State
70 S.E. 968, 9 Ga. App. 235, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 490
Opinion
1. The amendment to the motion for a new trial was “allowed,” but the ground thereof was not approved or verified in any manner by the trial judge, and' will not be considered by this court. Wilson v. Cobb, 4 Ga. App. 272 (61 S. E. 133) ; Thomas v. State, 7 Ga. App. 337 (66 S. E. 964); Henderson v. State, 7 Ga. App. 810 (68 S. E. 333); Thornton v. Cordell, 8 Ga. App. 588 (70 S. E. 17).
2. The original motion for a new trial contained only the usual general grounds, and the verdict is fully supported by the evidence.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wright v. State, 70 S.E. 968, 9 Ga. App. 235, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 490 (Ga. Ct. App. 1911).
70 S.E. 968 (Wright v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Braddy v. State
148 S.E. 600 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)
Trammell v. Shirley
145 S.E. 486 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)