Wright v. State
This text of 70 S.E. 968 (Wright v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The amendment to the motion for a new trial was “allowed,” but the ground thereof was not approved or verified in any manner by the trial judge, and' will not be considered by this court. Wilson v. Cobb, 4 Ga. App. 272 (61 S. E. 133) ; Thomas v. State, 7 Ga. App. 337 (66 S. E. 964); Henderson v. State, 7 Ga. App. 810 (68 S. E. 333); Thornton v. Cordell, 8 Ga. App. 588 (70 S. E. 17).
2. The original motion for a new trial contained only the usual general grounds, and the verdict is fully supported by the evidence.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
70 S.E. 968, 9 Ga. App. 235, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 490, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wright-v-state-gactapp-1911.