Braddy v. State
148 S.E. 600, 39 Ga. App. 784, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 555
Opinions
The special grounds of the motion for a new trial are not unqualifiedly approved by the trial judge, and consequently will not be considered. The State made out a case, and the defendant introduced no evidence and made no statement. The court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Braddy v. State, 148 S.E. 600, 39 Ga. App. 784, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 555 (Ga. Ct. App. 1929).
148 S.E. 600 (Braddy v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gamble v. State
39 S.E. 301 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1901)
Taylor v. Brown
40 S.E. 281 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1901)
Dunn v. State
42 S.E. 772 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)
Jackson v. State
43 S.E. 255 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1903)
Pollard v. State
54 S.E. 171 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)
Tribble v. Tribble
144 S.E. 665 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1928)
Wright v. State
70 S.E. 968 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1911)