Braddy v. State
148 S.E. 600, 39 Ga. App. 784, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 555
This text of 148 S.E. 600 (Braddy v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Braddy v. State, 148 S.E. 600, 39 Ga. App. 784, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 555 (Ga. Ct. App. 1929).
Opinions
The special grounds of the motion for a new trial are not unqualifiedly approved by the trial judge, and consequently will not be considered. The State made out a case, and the defendant introduced no evidence and made no statement. The court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Gamble v. State
39 S.E. 301 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1901)
Taylor v. Brown
40 S.E. 281 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1901)
Dunn v. State
42 S.E. 772 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)
Jackson v. State
43 S.E. 255 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1903)
Pollard v. State
54 S.E. 171 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)
Tribble v. Tribble
144 S.E. 665 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1928)
Wright v. State
70 S.E. 968 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1911)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
148 S.E. 600, 39 Ga. App. 784, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 555, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/braddy-v-state-gactapp-1929.