Pollard v. State

54 S.E. 171, 125 Ga. 270, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 125
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMay 11, 1906
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 54 S.E. 171 (Pollard v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pollard v. State, 54 S.E. 171, 125 Ga. 270, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 125 (Ga. 1906).

Opinion

Cobb, P. J.

1. “An amendment to a motion for a new trial, which has upon it an entry to the effect that it was ‘allowed’ by the judge, with nothing else to indicate an approval of its grounds, is not sufficiently verified to authorize this court to deal with the assignments of error therein.” Sterling v. Unity Cotton Mills, 119 Ga. 173, and cit.; Williams v. State, 120 Ga. 488, and cit.; Bradley v. State, 121 Ga. 162.

2. The verdict was authorized by the evidence, and no sufficient reason appears for reversing the judgment.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concitr.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Drake v. State
144 S.E.2d 519 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1965)
Price v. State
152 S.E. 572 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1930)
Braddy v. State
148 S.E. 600 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)
Trammell v. Shirley
145 S.E. 486 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
54 S.E. 171, 125 Ga. 270, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pollard-v-state-ga-1906.