Sterling v. Unity Cotton Mills
This text of 45 S.E. 975 (Sterling v. Unity Cotton Mills) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
...... 1. “An amendment to a motion for a new trial, which has upon it an entry to the effect that it was ‘ allowed ’ by the judge, with nothing else to indicate an approval of its grounds, is not sufficiently verified to authorize this court to deal with the assignments of error therein.” Dunn v. State, 116 Ga. 515. See also Jackson v. State, Id. 835, and cit.
2. The evidence adduced on the trial of this case being directly conflicting as to a controlling issue of fact, the verdict in favor of the prevailing party in the court below will be allowed to stand, since it has received the approval of the trial judge.
Judgment on main bill of exceptions affirmed; cross-bill dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
45 S.E. 975, 119 Ga. 173, 1903 Ga. LEXIS 76, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sterling-v-unity-cotton-mills-ga-1903.