Wilson v. Cobb
61 S.E. 133, 4 Ga. App. 272, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 265
Opinion
The original motion contains only the general grounds; the amendment contains several special grounds. The grounds of the amendment are not verified or approved by the trial judge. The following endorsement, signed by the judge, is not equivalent to an approval: “Bead, considered, and allowed.” Williams v. State, 120 Ga. 488 (48 S. E. 149); Sindy v. State, 120 Ga. 202 (47 S. E. 554); Jackson v. State, 116 Ga. 834 (43 S. E. 255).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wilson v. Cobb, 61 S.E. 133, 4 Ga. App. 272, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 265 (Ga. Ct. App. 1908).
61 S.E. 133 (Wilson v. Cobb) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mack v. State
74 S.E. 444 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1912)
Wright v. State
70 S.E. 968 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1911)
Henderson v. State
68 S.E. 333 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1910)