Wilson v. Cobb

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Wilson v. Cobb

61 S.E. 133, 4 Ga. App. 272, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 265

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 22, 1908

Docket993

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 61 S.E. 133 (Wilson v. Cobb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wilson v. Cobb, 61 S.E. 133, 4 Ga. App. 272, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 265 (Ga. Ct. App. 1908).

Pincite

Opinion

Powell, J.

The original motion contains only the general grounds; the amendment contains several special grounds. The grounds of the amendment are not verified or approved by the trial judge. The following endorsement, signed by the judge, is not equivalent to an approval: “Bead, considered, and allowed.” Williams v. State, 120 Ga. 488 (48 S. E. 149); Sindy v. State, 120 Ga. 202 (47 S. E. 554); Jackson v. State, 116 Ga. 834 (43 S. E. 255).

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Powell, J.

The original motion contains only the general grounds; the amendment contains several special grounds. The grounds of the amendment are not verified or approved by the trial judge. The following endorsement, signed by the judge, is not equivalent to an approval: “Bead, considered, and allowed.” Williams v. State, 120 Ga. 488 (48 S. E. 149); Sindy v. State, 120 Ga. 202 (47 S. E. 554); Jackson v. State, 116 Ga. 834 (43 S. E. 255).

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

61 S.E. 133, 4 Ga. App. 272, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 265, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-cobb-gactapp-1908.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack