Wright v. State
802 So. 2d 1160, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 16383, 2001 WL 1474980
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wright v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 739 So. 2d 1230 →
Opinion
Arthur N. Wright’s post-conviction motion is timely under Wood v. State, 750 So.2d 592 (Fla.1999). Wood was decided May 27, 1999, and Wright filed his motion on March 28, 2001. However, we affirm denial of post-conviction relief on the authority of Major v. State, 790 So.2d 550 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001). See also Bismark v. State, 796 So.2d 584 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001); Baker v. State, 796 So.2d 589 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001); Rhodes v. State, 701 So.2d 388 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wright v. State, 802 So. 2d 1160, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 16383, 2001 WL 1474980 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).
802 So. 2d 1160 (Wright v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Baker v. State
796 So. 2d 589 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Bismark v. State
796 So. 2d 584 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Major v. State
790 So. 2d 550 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Wood v. State
750 So. 2d 592 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)
Rhodes v. State
701 So. 2d 388 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)