Wright v. State

782 So. 2d 1007, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 5510, 2001 WL 417286
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wright v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 739 So. 2d 1230
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 25, 2001·No. No. 4D99-4237·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant, Linda Wright’s, sentences imposed upon her as a habitual felony offender and a prison releasee reof-fender. The trial court, however, orally sentenced appellant on Count I, robbery with a weapon, to life in prison as a habitual felony offender with a mandatory minimum of thirty years as a prison releasee reoffender. The written sentence imposed upon appellant was the reverse, thirty years as a habitual felony offender and life as a prison releasee reoffender which is not authorized1 and does not comport with the oral sentence imposed. As the oral sentence controls, we remand for the correction of the written sentence on Count I to comport with the oral sentence imposed by the trial court. See, e.g., Trapp v. State, 760 So.2d 924, 926 n. 1 (Fla.2000).

AFFIRMED BUT REMANDED FOR CORRECTION OF WRITTEN SENTENCE.

STONE, KLEIN and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wright v. State, 782 So. 2d 1007, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 5510, 2001 WL 417286 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

782 So. 2d 1007 (Wright v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Trapp v. State
760 So. 2d 924 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)