Wright v. State

429 So. 2d 836, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20807
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 19, 1983·No. No. 82-973·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After having revoked the appellant’s probation on two counts of an information charging the commission of third-degree felonies, the trial court sentenced the appellant on each count to a term of ten years, the sentences to run concurrently. The sentences imposed exceeded the five-year maximum allowable by law, see § 775.082(3)(d), Fla.Stat. (1981), and are, accordingly, vacated and the cause remanded for resentenc-ing. Since the record reflects that the trial court’s intent was that the appellant receive a ten-year sentence, the trial court may, if it chooses, accomplish that sentencing goal by imposing consecutive five-year sentences. Streeter v. State, 416 So.2d 1203 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Herring v. State, 411 So.2d 966 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).

Sentences vacated and cause remanded for resentencing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wright v. State, 429 So. 2d 836, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20807 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

429 So. 2d 836 (Wright v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Willis v. State
446 So. 2d 210 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)