Wright v. State

390 So. 2d 118, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17597
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 12, 1980·No. No. 79-26·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The question on this appeal is whether a person of eleven years, ten months and twenty-one days of age falls within the statutory classification of “eleven years of age or younger.” See Section 794.011(2). We answer in the negative and therefore reverse.

Thomas James Wright was convicted of committing a sexual battery upon a person of eleven years of age or younger in violation of Section 794.011(2), Florida Statutes (1977). The victim was eleven years, ten months and twenty-one days of age on the date of the offense and thus the defendant consistently argued throughout the proceedings below, that the victim was older than the statutory requirement of eleven years of age. We agree.

The trial court did not have the benefit of our decision in State v. Carroll, 378 So.2d 4 (Fla. 4th DCA), cert. denied, 385 So.2d 761 (Fla.1980) in which we held that the term “eleven years of age or younger” encompasses the time between a person’s birth and their eleventh birthday. Inasmuch as the victim in this case had passed her eleventh birthday, defendant’s conviction and sentence must be reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

LETTS, C. J., and GLICKSTEIN and HURLEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wright v. State, 390 So. 2d 118, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17597 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).

390 So. 2d 118 (Wright v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Hansen
404 So. 2d 199 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)