Wright v. State
396 So. 2d 864, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19202
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 14, 1981·No. No. 80-594·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We affirm the trial court’s denial of defendants’ Motion for Discharge pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.191. Defense counsel’s request for a continuance for the purpose of affording him additional [865]*865time to review discovery materials he received several days earlier was properly charged to defendant. See Rubiera v. Dade County, 305 So.2d 161 (Fla.1974); State ex rel. Gerstein v. Durant, 348 So.2d 405 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wright v. State, 396 So. 2d 864, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19202 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).
396 So. 2d 864 (Wright v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wallace v. State
3 Fla. Supp. 2d 116 (Florida Circuit Courts, 1982)