Wright v. People

92 Ill. 596
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 15, 1879
StatusPublished
Cited by17 cases

This text of 92 Ill. 596 (Wright v. People) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wright v. People, 92 Ill. 596 (Ill. 1879).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Scott

delivered the opinion of the Court:

The offence for which defendant was indicted in the court below was a misdemeanor, viz: selling intoxicating liquors contrary to the form of the statute. A trial was had at the March term, 1879, when defendant was found guilty on four counts of the indictment and sentenced to pay a fine of $25 on each count on which he was found guilty. The transcript of the record made in the ease was filed in the office of the clerk of this court on the 26th day of August, 1879, and although no writ of error or scire facias has, in fact, been issued, the parties have appeared and submitted the cause on briefs filed, intending, no doubt, to treat the cause as pending in this court on error. That, we think, can not be done. The recent statute to amend the act in regard to “ practice in courts of record ” was in force July 1, 1879, and provides, among other things, that “ appeals from and writs of error to the circuit court * * * 'in all criminal cases below the grade of felony, shall be taken directly to the Appellate Court.” Session Laws 1879, p. 222.

As the conviction in this case is for a misdemeanor, it follows the writ of error should have been sued out of the Appellate Court for the proper district. Although no motion has been made for that purpose, this court of its own motion will dismiss the writ of error for want of jurisdiction in the first instance to hear the errors assigned.

The writ of error will be dismissed.

Writ dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ser Vis v. Ser Vis
162 Ill. App. 378 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1911)
Fairbanks v. Carle
75 N.E. 360 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1905)
Eggleston v. Royal Trust Co.
61 N.E. 423 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1901)
Marder, Luse & Co. v. Campbell Printing Press & Mfg. Co.
76 Ill. App. 431 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1898)
Hartzell v. Warren
77 Ill. App. 274 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1898)
John F. Alles Plumbing Co. v. Alles
67 Ill. App. 252 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1896)
Hart v. Burch
31 Ill. App. 22 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1889)
Provident Savings Life Assurance Co. v. English
25 Ill. App. 134 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1887)
Decker v. Decker
16 Ill. App. 627 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1885)
Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co. v. Stephens
14 Ill. App. 507 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1884)
Illinois Central Railroad v. Willenborg
14 Ill. App. 508 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1884)
Kepley v. Luke
10 Ill. App. 403 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1882)
Andrews v. Andrews
9 Ill. App. 408 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1881)
City of East St. Louis v. Trustees of Schools
8 Ill. App. 295 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1881)
Carter v. Penn
8 Ill. App. 299 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1881)
McDowell v. Lucas
7 Ill. App. 128 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1880)
Lequatte v. Drury
6 Ill. App. 389 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1880)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
92 Ill. 596, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wright-v-people-ill-1879.