Andrews v. Andrews
9 Ill. App. 408, 1881 Ill. App. LEXIS 168
Opinion
There is a freehold involved in this case. We must, therefore, dismiss the writ of error on our own motion, because we have no jurisdiction of the subject matter.
Sess. Laws 1879, Sec. 2, page 222; Gage v. Busse, 94 Ill. 590; People v. Hotz, 92 Ill. 426; Same v. Wright, 92 Ill. 596.
The record may be withdrawn.
Writ of error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Andrews v. Andrews, 9 Ill. App. 408, 1881 Ill. App. LEXIS 168 (Ill. Ct. App. 1881).
9 Ill. App. 408 (Andrews v. Andrews) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re the probate of the will of Gowans
128 Ill. App. 287 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1906)
Peterson v. Guttormsen
125 Ill. App. 28 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1906)
Bice v. Hall
21 Ill. App. 298 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1886)