Bice v. Hall

21 Ill. App. 298, 1886 Ill. App. LEXIS 638
Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided November 20, 1886·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The County Court admitted to probate the proposed will of Benjamin L. Hall, but the Circuit Court on appeal reversed the order, and this appeal was taken.

The proposed will devises real estate in fee as it would not descend under the statute. A freehold is therefore involved. Andrews v. Andrews, 9 Ill. App. 408; S. C. 110 Ill. 223; Newbury v. Blatchford, 106 Ill. 584.,

An appeal in such a case does not lie to this court. Appellant may have leave to withdraw the record if she so desired.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bice v. Hall, 21 Ill. App. 298, 1886 Ill. App. LEXIS 638 (Ill. Ct. App. 1886).

21 Ill. App. 298 (Bice v. Hall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the probate of the will of Gowans
128 Ill. App. 287 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1906)
Peterson v. Guttormsen
125 Ill. App. 28 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1906)
Craig v. Southard
45 Ill. App. 529 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1893)