Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co. v. Stephens

14 Ill. App. 507, 1884 Ill. App. LEXIS 10
Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided April 18, 1884·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The appellant raises the point that Sec. 52, Ch. 114 is in violation- of Sec. 13, Art. 4, of the Constitution and therefore void. By the Practice Act as amended in 1879, when the validity of a statute is involved the appeal must go directly to the Supreme Court. See Act of 1879, Sess. Laws, page 222.

We must therefore dismiss the appeal of our own motion as we have no jurisdiction to consider the question involved. Leave will be given to withdraw record, abstracts and briefs. St. L. T. Co. v. Canty, 103 Ill. 423; Marion Co. v. Lear, 108 Ill. 343; Wright v. People, etc., 92 Ill. 596.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co. v. Stephens, 14 Ill. App. 507, 1884 Ill. App. LEXIS 10 (Ill. Ct. App. 1884).

14 Ill. App. 507 (Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co. v. Stephens) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Provident Savings Life Assurance Co. v. English
25 Ill. App. 134 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1887)