Woods v. Walker

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Woods v. Walker

1930 OK 19, 283 P. 1002, 141 Okla. 31, 1930 Okla. LEXIS 4

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedJanuary 7, 1930

Docket20900

StatusPublished

This text of 1930 OK 19 (Woods v. Walker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Woods v. Walker, 1930 OK 19, 283 P. 1002, 141 Okla. 31, 1930 Okla. LEXIS 4 (Okla. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CORIAM.

In this cause the plaintiff in error attempts to appeal from a judgment and order of the district court of Tulsa county. On November 18, 1929, there was filed with the clerk of this court a purported case-made. No petition in error has been filed in this cause, and this court is without jurisdiction to review the judgment complained of. Wetzell v. McConkey, 127 Okla. 165, 260 Pac. 77; Tinker v. Scharnhorst, 114 Okla. 27, 242 Pac. 1041; Sterling v. Boucher, 79 Okla. 32, 190 Pac. 1090; Dill v. Marks, 53 Okla. 142, 155 Pac. 521; Hopley v. Benton, 38 Okla. 223, 132 Pac. 808.

This court not having jurisdiction to review the judgment complained of, upon motion of the defendant in error, the attempted appeal is hereby dismissed.

Note. — See “Appeal and Error,” 3 C. J. § 1003, p. 1082, n. 30.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CORIAM.

In this cause the plaintiff in error attempts to appeal from a judgment and order of the district court of Tulsa county. On November 18, 1929, there was filed with the clerk of this court a purported case-made. No petition in error has been filed in this cause, and this court is without jurisdiction to review the judgment complained of. Wetzell v. McConkey, 127 Okla. 165, 260 Pac. 77; Tinker v. Scharnhorst, 114 Okla. 27, 242 Pac. 1041; Sterling v. Boucher, 79 Okla. 32, 190 Pac. 1090; Dill v. Marks, 53 Okla. 142, 155 Pac. 521; Hopley v. Benton, 38 Okla. 223, 132 Pac. 808.

This court not having jurisdiction to review the judgment complained of, upon motion of the defendant in error, the attempted appeal is hereby dismissed.

Note. — See “Appeal and Error,” 3 C. J. § 1003, p. 1082, n. 30.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1930 OK 19, 283 P. 1002, 141 Okla. 31, 1930 Okla. LEXIS 4, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woods-v-walker-okla-1930.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack