Dill v. Marks
This text of 1916 OK 201 (Dill v. Marks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this case the case-made was filed in, this court on the last day of the. six-months period allowed for perfecting the appeal. Eight days thereafter there was filed with the clerk of this court a purported petition in error, and the cause is now pending. before us on motion to dismiss on the ground that the proceedings were not commenced within the statutory period. The point is well taken, and the appeal must be dismissed. A petition in error is a necessary requisite to the commencement of the proceedings, which “shall be commenced within six months from the rendition of the judgment or final order complained of.” Chapter 18, p. 35, Sess. Laws 1910-11; White v. Hooker et al., 47 Okla. 453, 148 Pac. 719; McMasters v. English et al., 26 Okla. 818, 110 Pac. 1070; Board of County Commissioners v. Oxley, 8 Okla. 502, 58 Pac. 651; Marvel v. White, 5 Okla. 739, 50 Pac. 87.
Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1916 OK 201, 155 P. 521, 53 Okla. 142, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 374, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dill-v-marks-okla-1916.