Tinker v. Scharnhorst

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Tinker v. Scharnhorst

1925 OK 1031, 242 P. 1041, 114 Okla. 27, 1925 Okla. LEXIS 1005

Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided December 22, 1925·No. 16538·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

NICHOLSON, C. J.

This cause is before us on motion of the defendant in error to dismiss the appeal.

On June 26, 1925, there was filed in the office of the clerk of the court what purports to he a case-made, entitled as above, but no petition in error has been filed, as required by section 782, O. O. S, 1921. Therefore, no action has been instituted in this court. McMasters v. English, 26 Okla. 818, 110 Pac. 1070; Dill v. Marks, 53 Okla. 142, *28 155 Pac. 521; Sterling v. Boucher, 79 Okla. 32, 190 Pac. 1090.

The appeal is dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NICHOLSON, C. J.

This cause is before us on motion of the defendant in error to dismiss the appeal.

On June 26, 1925, there was filed in the office of the clerk of the court what purports to he a case-made, entitled as above, but no petition in error has been filed, as required by section 782, O. O. S, 1921. Therefore, no action has been instituted in this court. McMasters v. English, 26 Okla. 818, 110 Pac. 1070; Dill v. Marks, 53 Okla. 142, *28 155 Pac. 521; Sterling v. Boucher, 79 Okla. 32, 190 Pac. 1090.

The appeal is dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Tinker v. Scharnhorst, 1925 OK 1031, 242 P. 1041, 114 Okla. 27, 1925 Okla. LEXIS 1005 (Okla. 1925).

Pincite

1925 OK 1031 (Tinker v. Scharnhorst) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related