Woods v. State
331 S.W.3d 722, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 220, 2011 WL 590348
Opinion
ORDER
Terry Woods appeals from the judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 24.035 without an eviden-tiary hearing. The motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value and we affirm by written order. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Woods v. State, 331 S.W.3d 722, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 220, 2011 WL 590348 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).
331 S.W.3d 722 (Woods v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Larkin
331 S.W.3d 722 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)