Home/Missouri Court of Appeals/Woods v. State

Woods v. State

280 S.W.3d 783, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 445, 2009 WL 983063
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 14, 2009
DocketED 90942
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 280 S.W.3d 783 (Woods v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Woods v. State, 280 S.W.3d 783, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 445, 2009 WL 983063 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Kendrick Woods, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McLemore v. State
280 S.W.3d 783 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
280 S.W.3d 783, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 445, 2009 WL 983063, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woods-v-state-moctapp-2009.