State v. Larkin

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Larkin

331 S.W.3d 722, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 188, 2011 WL 590338

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 22, 2011·No. ED 94331·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Shelton Larkin appeals the trial court’s judgment and sentence after a jury convicted him of unlawful possession of a firearm and unlawful use of a weapon.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Shelton Larkin appeals the trial court’s judgment and sentence after a jury convicted him of unlawful possession of a firearm and unlawful use of a weapon.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Larkin, 331 S.W.3d 722, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 188, 2011 WL 590338 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

331 S.W.3d 722 (State v. Larkin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related