Woods v. State

214 So. 3d 803, 2017 WL 1438510, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 5665
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 24, 2017·No. CASE NO. 1D15-4042·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

On Rehearing En Banc

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

MAKAR, J., concurs in an opinion in which ROBERTS, C.J., LEWIS and BILBREY, JJ., join, and in which WETHERELL, J., joins except as to Part C. OSTERHAUS, J., concurs in an opinion in which ROWE, KELSEY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., join. WINOKUR, J., concurs with opinion. WOLF, J., dissents with opinion. WINSOR, J., dissents in an opinion in which B.L. THOMAS and RAY, JJ., join. JAY, J., recused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Woods v. State, 214 So. 3d 803, 2017 WL 1438510, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 5665 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

214 So. 3d 803 (Woods v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

JUAN C. CASIANO v. STATE OF FLORIDA
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2019
Reginald Lee Booker, I I I v. State of Florida
244 So. 3d 1151 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)