Washington v. Recuenco

546 U.S. 1087, 126 S. Ct. 1134
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 9, 2006
DocketNo. 05-83
StatusPublished

This text of 546 U.S. 1087 (Washington v. Recuenco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Washington v. Recuenco, 546 U.S. 1087, 126 S. Ct. 1134 (2006).

Opinion

-Sup. Ct. Wash. [Certiorari granted, ante, p. 960.] Motion of respondent for appointment of counsel granted. Gregory C. Link, Esq., of Seattle, Wash., is appointed to serve as counsel for respondent in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
546 U.S. 1087, 126 S. Ct. 1134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/washington-v-recuenco-scotus-2006.