FEDERAL · 26 U.S.C. · Chapter Subchapter A—Crimes
Fraud and false statements
26 U.S.C. § 7206
This text of 26 U.S.C. § 7206 (Fraud and false statements) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
26 U.S.C. § 7206.
Text
Any person who—
Willfully makes and subscribes any return, statement, or other document, which contains or is verified by a written declaration that it is made under the penalties of perjury, and which he does not believe to be true and correct as to every material matter; or
Willfully aids or assists in, or procures, counsels, or advises the preparation or presentation under, or in connection with any matter arising under, the internal revenue laws, of a return, affidavit, claim, or other document, which is fraudulent or is false as to any material matter, whether or not such falsity or fraud is with the knowledge or consent of the person authorized or required to present such return, affidavit, claim, or document; or
Simulates or falsely or fraudulently executes or signs any bond, permit
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Neder v. United States
527 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1999)
United States v. Theodore J. Isaacs and Otto Kerner, Jr.
493 F.2d 1124 (Seventh Circuit, 1974)
United States v. Aguila-Montes De Oca
655 F.3d 915 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)
United States v. Robert E. Ladum Ronald D. Van Vliet Daniel Hong Echols Doyle Ford David C. Grigonis James R. Weaver
141 F.3d 1328 (Ninth Circuit, 1998)
United States v. Brian Bafia, Michael Kerridan, John Cappas and Philip Laporta
949 F.2d 1465 (Seventh Circuit, 1992)
United States v. William Lee Workinger
90 F.3d 1409 (Ninth Circuit, 1996)
United States v. Victor Arditti, United States of America v. Guillermo Avila
955 F.2d 331 (Fifth Circuit, 1992)
Statewide Grievance Committee v. Shluger
646 A.2d 781 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1994)
United States v. George F. Brown
574 F.2d 1274 (Fifth Circuit, 1978)
United States v. Robert Vaio Wells
394 F.3d 725 (Ninth Circuit, 2005)
United States v. Robert I. Falk
605 F.2d 1005 (Seventh Circuit, 1979)
United States v. Fred E. Cooper
394 F.3d 172 (Third Circuit, 2005)
United States v. Elizabeth Ann Pratt Stokes
998 F.2d 279 (Fifth Circuit, 1993)
United States v. Alan H. Rothstein
530 F.2d 1275 (Fifth Circuit, 1976)
United States v. Bragg
582 F.3d 965 (Ninth Circuit, 2009)
United States v. Veronica Fairchild
819 F.3d 399 (Eighth Circuit, 2016)
United States v. Dimora
843 F. Supp. 2d 799 (N.D. Ohio, 2012)
United States v. Dennis R. Abbey
149 F.3d 1191 (Tenth Circuit, 1998)
United States v. Sandra K. Abram
83 F.3d 433 (Tenth Circuit, 1996)
United States v. Diesel
238 F. App'x 398 (Tenth Circuit, 2007)
Source Credit
History
(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 852; Pub. L. 97–248, title III, §329(c), Sept. 3, 1982, 96 Stat. 618.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1982—Pub. L. 97–248 substituted "$100,000 ($500,000 in the case of a corporation)" for "$5,000".
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1982 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 97–248 applicable to offenses committed after Sept. 3, 1982, see section 329(e) of Pub. L. 97–248, set out as a note under section 7201 of this title.
Amendments
1982—Pub. L. 97–248 substituted "$100,000 ($500,000 in the case of a corporation)" for "$5,000".
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1982 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 97–248 applicable to offenses committed after Sept. 3, 1982, see section 329(e) of Pub. L. 97–248, set out as a note under section 7201 of this title.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
26 U.S.C. § 7206, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/26/7206.