Woodfin v. Angelone

46 F. App'x 729

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth Wayne Woodfin seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge’s opinion and conclude on the reasoning of the magis trate judge that Woodfin has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. * See Woodfin v. Angelone, No. CA-01-824-3 (E.D. Va. June 11, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

* This case was decided by a magistrate judge exercising jurisdiction upon consent of the parties. 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).