Woodfin v. Angelone

35 F. App'x 374
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Woodfin v. Angelone. Read the opinion of the Court — 46 F. App'x 729
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 28, 2002·No. 02-6466·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth Wayne Woodfin appeals the magistrate judge’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 *375 (West 1994 & Supp.2001). * We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certifícate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. See Woodfin v. Angelone, No. CA-01-444 (E.D.Va. Mar. 7, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

*

The parties consented to the exercise of jurisdiction by a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (1994).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Woodfin v. Angelone, 35 F. App'x 374 (4th Cir. 2002).

35 F. App'x 374 (Woodfin v. Angelone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related