Woodard v. State

6 So. 3d 726, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 3200, 2009 WL 996840
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 15, 2009·No. No. 2D08-500·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

SILBERMAN, Judge.

In this appeal pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Quarra Woodard challenges the revocation of her community control and her resulting sentence. We affirm but note that Woodard’s written sentence fails to conform to the trial court’s oral pronouncement of sentence. Following the revocation of Woodard’s community control, the trial court orally imposed a sentence of 39 months’ imprisonment. However, the written sentence reflects 39.9 months’ imprisonment.

Woodard did not preserve this issue for appellate review because she did not object or file a motion to correct sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 3.800(b). Accordingly, we affirm without prejudice to any right Woodard may have to file an appropriate postconviction motion addressing this issue. See Young v. State, 988 So.2d 1128, 1129 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008) (affirming Anders appeal without prejudice to any right the defendant had to file an appropriate postconviction motion to address an unpreserved sentencing error).

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA and KELLY, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Woodard v. State, 6 So. 3d 726, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 3200, 2009 WL 996840 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

6 So. 3d 726 (Woodard v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tyrone K. Powell v. State of Florida
167 So. 3d 392 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2015)
Lyons v. State
148 So. 3d 127 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
McCall v. State
88 So. 3d 1015 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
Ingraham v. State
82 So. 3d 1101 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)