Tyrone K. Powell v. State of Florida
This text of 167 So. 3d 392 (Tyrone K. Powell v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
We initially accepted jurisdiction under article V, section 3(b)(4) of the Florida Constitution to review Powell v. State, 133 So.3d 594 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014), in which the First District Court of Appeal certified the following questions to be of great public importance:
NOTWITHSTANDING MADDOX, SHOULD AN APPELLATE COURT CORRECT A SENTENCING ERROR IN AN ANDERS CASE WHICH WAS NOT PRESERVED PURSUANT TO THE APPLICABLE RULES OF PROCEDURE? IF NOT, WHAT STEPS SHOULD AN APPELLATE COURT FOLLOW TO CARRY OUT THE MANDATES OF ANDERS AND CAU-SEY IN SUCH A CASE?
After further consideration, we conclude that' review was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we dismiss review.
It is so ordered.
NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ALLOWED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
167 So. 3d 392, 40 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 324, 2015 Fla. LEXIS 1280, 2015 WL 3617873, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tyrone-k-powell-v-state-of-florida-fla-2015.