Woodard v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Woodard v. State

884 So. 2d 100, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 5582, 2004 WL 868187

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 23, 2004

DocketNo. 2D03-1504

StatusPublished

This text of 884 So. 2d 100 (Woodard v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Woodard v. State, 884 So. 2d 100, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 5582, 2004 WL 868187 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

VILLANTI, Judge.

Edward David Woodard entered a plea of nolo contendere to failing to register as a sexual predator while reserving his right to appeal, on procedural due process grounds, the constitutionality of the Florida Sexual Predators Act. In support of his due process argument, Woodard cites Espindola v. State, 855 So.2d 1281 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003), which conflicts with this court’s decision in Milks v. State, 848 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 2d DCA), review granted, 859 So.2d 514 (Fla.2003). We reject Woodard’s due process argument, see id., affirm his judgment and sentence, and certify conflict with Espindola.

Affirmed; conflict certified.

NORTHCUTT and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

VILLANTI, Judge.

Edward David Woodard entered a plea of nolo contendere to failing to register as a sexual predator while reserving his right to appeal, on procedural due process grounds, the constitutionality of the Florida Sexual Predators Act. In support of his due process argument, Woodard cites Espindola v. State, 855 So.2d 1281 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003), which conflicts with this court’s decision in Milks v. State, 848 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 2d DCA), review granted, 859 So.2d 514 (Fla.2003). We reject Woodard’s due process argument, see id., affirm his judgment and sentence, and certify conflict with Espindola.

Affirmed; conflict certified.

NORTHCUTT and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

884 So. 2d 100, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 5582, 2004 WL 868187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woodard-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack