Drayton v. State
944 So. 2d 499, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 20789, 2006 WL 3613609
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 13, 2006·No. No. 4D06-3427·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Affirmed. This affirmance is without prejudice to Appellant re-filing a specific public records request with the clerk’s office for the charging documents at issue. See Woodard v. State, 885 So.2d 444 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004) citing Wootton v. Cook, 590 So.2d 1039 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); see also Fla. R. Jud. P. 2.420(e)(1). We note Appellee’s representation that once the fee is [500]*500paid, the clerk’s office will comply with the request in a timely fashion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Drayton v. State, 944 So. 2d 499, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 20789, 2006 WL 3613609 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).
944 So. 2d 499 (Drayton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jackson v. State
944 So. 2d 499 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)