Woodard v. State

840 So. 2d 355, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2591, 2003 WL 729181
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 5, 2003
DocketNo. 4D02-2923
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 840 So. 2d 355 (Woodard v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Woodard v. State, 840 So. 2d 355, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2591, 2003 WL 729181 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order denying appellant’s petition for writ of mandamus without prejudice to refile his petition within thirty (30) days. The revised petition shall in-[356]*356elude copies of all correspondence substantiating appellant’s prior written requests and entitlement to the requested records under section 119.07, Florida Statutes (2002).

STONE, STEVENSON and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Woodard v. State
885 So. 2d 444 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
840 So. 2d 355, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2591, 2003 WL 729181, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woodard-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.