Woodard v. State
840 So. 2d 355, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2591, 2003 WL 729181
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 5, 2003·No. No. 4D02-2923·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We affirm the order denying appellant’s petition for writ of mandamus without prejudice to refile his petition within thirty (30) days. The revised petition shall in-[356]*356elude copies of all correspondence substantiating appellant’s prior written requests and entitlement to the requested records under section 119.07, Florida Statutes (2002).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Woodard v. State, 840 So. 2d 355, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2591, 2003 WL 729181 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).
840 So. 2d 355 (Woodard v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Woodard v. State
885 So. 2d 444 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)