Wood v. Wagnon
This text of 6 U.S. 9 (Wood v. Wagnon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
WOOD
v.
WAGNON.
Supreme Court of United States.
The judgment was reversed, because it did not appear upon the record that the circuit court had jurisdiction of the case.
The proceedings stated, that "the petition of John "Peter Wagnon, a citizen of the state of Pennsylvania, "sheweth,
"That James Wood, of the state of Georgia," &c.
The objection taken was, that it did not appear that the plaintiff and defendant were citizens of different states, and on that ground the judgment was reversed, upon the authority of Bingham v. Cabot et al. 3 Dall. 382.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
6 U.S. 9, 2 L. Ed. 191, 2 Cranch 9, 1804 U.S. LEXIS 247, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wood-v-wagnon-scotus-1804.