Bingham v. Cabot
This text of 3 U.S. 382 (Bingham v. Cabot) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
BINGHAM, Plaintiff in Error,
versus
CABOT, et al.
Supreme Court of United States.
*383 Lee, Attorney General, contended for the Plaintiff in error.
THE COURT were clearly of opinion, that it was necessary to set forth the citizenship (or alienage, where a foreigner was concerned) of the respective parties, in order to bring the *384 case within the jurisdiction of the Circuit Court; and that the record, in the present case, was in that respect defective.
This cause and many others, in the same predicament, were, accordingly, struck off the docket.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 U.S. 382, 1 L. Ed. 646, 3 Dall. 382, 1798 U.S. LEXIS 146, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bingham-v-cabot-scotus-1798.