Home/Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas/Wood v. State

Wood v. State

83 S.W.2d 670, 128 Tex. Crim. 633, 1935 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 312
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 24, 1935
DocketNo. 17553.
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 83 S.W.2d 670 (Wood v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wood v. State, 83 S.W.2d 670, 128 Tex. Crim. 633, 1935 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 312 (Tex. 1935).

Opinions

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

Theft is the offense; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The appeal bond which appears in the record is insufficient to authorize consideration of the appeal by this court for the reason that it is not approved by the judge who presided in the trial of the case. See article 818, C. C. P., 1925; also Baker v. State, 113 Texas Crim. Rep., 120; Shadwick v. State, 122 Texas Crim. Rep., 70; Boggs v. State, 75 S. W. (2d) 680.

The appeal will be dismissed upon the authority stated. If the, appellant desires to perfect his appeal within fifteen days, it may be reinstated. Otherwise the dismissal will be conclusive.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Boggus v. State
95 S.W.2d 428 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1936)
Morales v. State
91 S.W.2d 1066 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1936)
Watson v. State
91 S.W.2d 359 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1936)
Teel v. State
91 S.W.2d 747 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1936)
Bell v. State
89 S.W.2d 995 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
83 S.W.2d 670, 128 Tex. Crim. 633, 1935 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 312, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wood-v-state-texcrimapp-1935.