Home/Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas/Wood v. State

Wood v. State

83 S.W.2d 670, 128 Tex. Crim. 633, 1935 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 312
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided April 24, 1935·No. No. 17553.·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinions

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

Theft is the offense; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The appeal bond which appears in the record is insufficient to authorize consideration of the appeal by this court for the reason that it is not approved by the judge who presided in the trial of the case. See article 818, C. C. P., 1925; also Baker v. State, 113 Texas Crim. Rep., 120; Shadwick v. State, 122 Texas Crim. Rep., 70; Boggs v. State, 75 S. W. (2d) 680.

The appeal will be dismissed upon the authority stated. If the, appellant desires to perfect his appeal within fifteen days, it may be reinstated. Otherwise the dismissal will be conclusive.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wood v. State, 83 S.W.2d 670, 128 Tex. Crim. 633, 1935 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 312 (Tex. 1935).

83 S.W.2d 670 (Wood v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Boggus v. State
95 S.W.2d 428 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1936)
Morales v. State
91 S.W.2d 1066 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1936)
Watson v. State
91 S.W.2d 359 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1936)
Teel v. State
91 S.W.2d 747 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1936)
Bell v. State
89 S.W.2d 995 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1935)